Anne Favret, Oncologist

Dr. Favret, a native of the Washington , D.C. area, is a Magna Cum Laude graduate of Catholic University . She received her medical degree at Temple University . Dr. Favret completed her Internship and Residency training at Georgetown University and completed her Fellowship training at Stanford University . While at Stanford she focused primarily on clinical research for breast cancer.

Dr. Favret has published several review articles and original research papers, in addition to a book chapter in the area of breast cancer management. She is Board Certified in Internal Medicine and Medical Oncology. Dr. Favret is also an associate member of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. She is a physician on staff with Fairfax-Northern Virginia Hematology-Oncology (FNVHO) in 1999. Dr. Favret has a special interest in treating breast cancer. Learn more about FNVHO at http://www.fnvho.com.

Questions and Answers

What is my risk of recurrence?  

Every patient's risk is very different and is comprised of various features of her specific breast cancer, including size, lymph node involvement and ER/PR and Her2 neu status. These features also help dictate treatment options  

What are the side effects of treatment?

The side effects of chemo include fatigue and more fatigue. Some patients have nausea, diarrhea or constipation.  Hair loss occurs about 3 weeks into chemo.  Some people suffer from mouth sores and numbness and tingling of their hands and feet.  

How did this happen to me; I have no family history?

Over 70 % of patients diagnosed with breast cancer have no family history.  The cause is still very unclear.


Questions & Answers

There seem to be a lot more young women getting diagnosed with breast cancer. Also, their cancers seem more aggressive. To what do you attribute this?

The actual incidence of breast cancer is decreasing, but we do not
see that in our younger patients. Younger women need to examine their breast regularly and start screening mammograms at age 40 or younger if there is a family history. Women under 50 diagnosed with breast cancer must be considered for genetic testing and the BRCA1 and 2 mutations are more commonly seen in younger patients. Pre-menopausal women can present with more aggressive types of breast cancer including ER/PR and Her2neu negative disease.

I've heard a lot in the news lately about MRI's in conjuction with or instead of mammograms. Can you tell me more about each method of diagnostic imaging? Which is more reliable and when?

The role of MRI is the detection and screening of breast cancer is
controversial. MRI are more sensitive in detecting breast cancer but can also lead to more unnecessary biopsies. New patients diagnosed with breast cancer should receive an MRI looking for disease elsewhere in their breasts. Patients with a history of BRCA positivity should receive yearly MRI. The is however, still a role for mammogram for screening most women

What is chemotherapy and why is it effective?

Chemotherapy is given to women with a diagnosis of breast cancer in an attempt to decrease their risk of the cancer returning. Chemotherapy goes throughout the body looking to kill cancer cells before they have a time to lodge in places like the liver, lung or bones. Chemotherpay is not for all patients with chemotherapy and the individual drugs should be tailored by your oncologist for you.

Jillian H. Davis, Ph.D., Breast Cancer Researcher
Dr. Jillian H. Davis is an Assistant Professor of Pharmaceutical Sciences in the School of Pharmacy at Hampton University, where she conducts cancer research. Her research focuses on increasing the effectiveness of breast cancer chemotherapy while reducing the negative side effects of therapy. Dr. Davis' long term goal is to perform cutting edge research at Hampton University centered on developing optimal chemotherapeutic treatments and reducing health disparities among women and minorities.

Dr. Davis has published her research in several peer-reviewed journals. She currently serves on the editorial board for the Journal of Best Practices in Health Professions Diversity: Research, Education and Policy. She is also a member of the Research Advisory Council for the Association of Minority Health Professions Schools (AMPHS). Dr. Davis earned her Ph.D. in Pharmacology from Howard University, and a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemistry from North Carolina A&T State University . In February 2007, Dr. Davis was named by Ebony magazine as one of their “30 Leaders Of The Future”.

Questions and Answers

I have heard a lot recently about proton beam therapy. What is the difference between radiation therapy and proton beam therapy? If it is so much more effective, why isn't it made more readily available?

A: As you probably already know, conventional radiation therapy treats cancers with beams of high energy particles, namely x-ray particles. Radiation therapy is currently employed in the treatment of many cancers, most often in conjunction with surgery and/or chemotherapy. Radiation therapy is a localized method of treatment and is utilized to decrease recurrence and to shrink tumor size prior to surgery. Although conventional radiation therapy has been around for more than one hundred years, there are many drawbacks. One of the major drawbacks is the toxicity caused to surrounding healthy tissue by conventional radiotherapy. In the case of breast cancer therapy, this toxicity may affect the heart and lungs leading to cardiovascular disease and secondary malignancies. Proton beam therapy is a very precise type of radiation therapy that delivers a more accurate dose of radiation to the specific target site.

Proton beam therapy differs from conventional radiation therapy in many ways. First, conventional radiation therapy uses x-ray beams whereas proton beam therapy utilizes protons, which are positively charged particles found in the nucleus of an atom. Proton therapy, like all forms of radiotherapy, works by aiming energetic ionizing particles, in this case protons, to the target tumor. These particles damage the DNA of cells and ultimately results in cell death. Because of their high rate of division and their reduced ability to repair damaged DNA, cancerous cells are particularly susceptible to this attack on their DNA. Proton therapy’s ability to deliver a low dose of radiation to the surface of tissue with an increased dose at the tumor site makes it superior to conventional radiation.

The second major difference between conventional radiotherapy and proton beam therapy is that proton therapy is a much more accurate method of delivering radiation. The radiation pattern emitted by the proton beam can be conformed or shaped to the exact size of the tumor. In addition, a highly concentrated dose of radiation is delivered to the tumor site with decreased effects to the surface layer of skin and decreased toxicity to the surrounding tissues. The proton beam enters the body at a low concentration and reaches its maximum concentration at the target site. This in turn reduces the toxic effects to healthy nearby tissues. This target specific effect can reduce the risk of acute and chronic toxicity, including side effects of the heart and lungs that may accompany conventional radiation therapy in the treatment of breast cancer.

Currently, there are five operating proton facilities in the United States which offer proton beam therapy. This therapy is not more widespread because the building of these state-of-the-art proton beam treatment facilities is extremely expensive. There are however several facilities in the development phase including a facility at the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center and one at my home institution, Hampton University in the Tidewater, Virginia area. Proton beam therapy is covered by most insurance plans as well as Medicare. To learn more about proton beam therapy and the facilities that offer such therapy you can visit the website of The National Association for Proton Therapy (www.proton-therapy.org).

Research to evaluate the efficacy of treating breast cancer with proton beam therapy is ongoing. Physicians at Loma Linda University Treatment Center, in southern California, are currently developing a protocol that may soon be used for the treatment of breast cancer. To stay abreast of current advances in the treatment of breast cancer with proton beam therapy and whether you would be a good candidate for such therapy you should consult your oncologist or health care provider.

Questions & Answers

I am 28 years old and I have recently been diagnosed with breast cancer. I don’t have any children but have always dreamed of being a mother. Will chemotherapy make me infertile? Are there options for preserving my fertility so that I may have children in the future?

A: Your first reaction to a diagnosis of breast cancer may understandably be anger, sadness and depression. For many young women diagnosed with breast cancer, these feelings may be coupled with uncertainties about fertility. According to the American Cancer Society, 25% of new breast cancer cases are in women of childbearing age. However, with the strides that have been made in cancer research women diagnosed with breast cancer are living longer, more productive lives. Breast cancer is no longer a death sentence. Treatment options have expanded to focus not only on survival but quality of life as well. Future fertility is a major concern for a lot of women diagnosed with breast cancer. There are many avenues young women with breast cancer can explore to preserve fertility.

The current therapies for the treatment of breast cancer include surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. Surgery does not affect fertility and radiation has little to no affect. However, chemotherapy can greatly reduce a breast cancer patient’s fertility. The extent of the detrimental effects that chemotherapy will have on a woman’s fertility depends on the age of the patient, the specific chemotherapeutic agent used, and the total dose of that agent. Chemotherapeutic agents cause infertility due to their harmful affects on the ovaries. As you may know, the ovaries are the organs that produce and house a female’s eggs until they are released during ovulation. While chemotherapeutic drugs produce their desired effects by killing cancer cells, they also kill normal cells in the process. Some of the normal cells that are affected are the woman’s reproductive eggs. It is important to note that chemotherapy can cause a more rapid loss of eggs than the decrease that normally occurs over time. You see, women are born with a certain number of eggs and as we age this number decreases. Coupled with the natural decline in reproductive eggs, the effects of chemotherapy on the ovaries in older women are more pronounced leading to an increased chance of infertility. However, in the case of younger women, there is a better chance of maintaining fertility after chemotherapy due to a larger supply of eggs that still remains. Because of these reasons, the risk of infertility is largely dependent on the age of the patient.

Research has shown that certain chemotherapeutic drugs are more likely to result in infertility than others. The most common chemotherapy used for the treatment of breast cancer is CMF which consists of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil. Alkylating agents, which are a common class of drugs used in the treatment of cancer, are the most toxic agents to the ovaries and a woman’s fertility. Cyclophosphamide is one example of an alkylating agent. Methotrexate and fluorouracil, on the other hand are thought to have minimal effects on the ovaries and ultimately the patient’s fertility. Not only is the specific drug that is used a factor in infertility, the total dose of that drug is also a factor. The higher the dose and the longer the length of administration the greater the damage that is done to the ovaries.

There are options for women who have been diagnosed with breast cancer and would like to have children in the future. These options include embryo freezing, also known as embryo cryopreservation, freezing eggs (oocyte cryopreservation), and ovarian cryopreservation. Embryo cryopreservation involves extracting the eggs from the female patient, fertilizing them outside the body and freezing the fertilized eggs or embryos until the woman is ready to become pregnant. Oftentimes, prior to extracting the eggs, the woman is given fertility drugs to increase the number of eggs that can be produced. However, it may not be a good idea to give women diagnosed with breast cancer fertility treatments. The reasoning is because these treatments increase estrogen production which may stimulate the growth and metastasis of the existing cancer. However, in the absence of the fertility treatments only 1-2 eggs may be extracted and preserved per cycle. If fertility treatments are necessary, a short course of high dose tamoxifen may be most beneficial for breast cancer patients. Tamoxifen will increase the production of eggs while minimizing the risk of breast cancer growth and metastasis. Once the woman has completed chemotherapy, she should speak with her oncologist about when it is safe to utilize the embryos for pregnancy.

An additional therapy that can be used is the freezing of the patient’s eggs. In this procedure the eggs are harvested in the same manner as embryo freezing. Oocyte cryopreservation may be a viable option for women who do not have a significant other nor wish to use a sperm donor. These eggs are frozen without being fertilized. They are stored until the woman is ready to become pregnant. To date, the number of live births utilizing this method have been few, however major advances have been made in perfecting this technique.

An experimental method that is also used to preserve fertility is the freezing of ovarian tissue, a procedure known as ovarian cryopreservation. In this procedure, a woman’s entire ovary or a slice of ovarian tissue containing eggs is removed prior to chemotherapy. This ovarian tissue is frozen until the woman is ready to become pregnant. Once that time has arrived, the tissue is implanted in the pelvis or arm of the woman. Over time, blood vessels nourish the tissue and eggs begin to develop and mature. The mature eggs are then removed and fertilized. After fertilization, the embryo is implanted in the woman’s uterus and she is able to carry the baby to term.

It is understandable that the thought of breast cancer is marked by mixed emotions. However, for the woman with a maternal instinct, the focus does not have to be on grim fertility outcomes. There are multiple interventions that have been researched to decrease the chance of infertility and increase the possibility of pregnancy. If having children is a concern, you should speak with your oncologist and a fertility specialist prior to undergoing breast cancer treatment. They will be able to advise you about the best options to protect your fertility.

Deborah Lindquist, M.D., is a Medical Oncologist

Deborah Lindquist, M.D., is a Medical Oncologist. She did her residency training in Internal Medicine at the University of Minnesota Hospitals and clinics in Minneapolis; and completed fellowship training in Hematology and Medical Oncology at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics.
Her first position was at the Boston VA Medical Center. In 1989, she started her own clinic in Sedona, Arizona. Her clinic provides a healing, natural setting where patients can receive treatment. Her area of particular clinical expertise is breast cancer. She is actively involved in clinical research. Deborah was an author on the article in The New England Journal of Medicine, December 27, 2006, describing the pivotal trial using a new agent lapatinib with oral chemotherapy of capecitabine, that showed a profound benefit for women with Her 2 positive breast cancer.
She is also on the national breast cancer committee for Beyond Limits Healing, She is a member of the American Society for Clinical Oncology, the American Society of Hematology, am a fellow in the American College of Physicians, and a member in the American Society of Breast Diseases.
Deborah has a personal mission to support the healing of emotional and physical pain through connection with people. Her mission is supported by the Avatar® tools, a series of exercises and practices that help put you in control of your life. “I also want to help you meet this incredible challenge of breast cancer with courage, dignity, and self determination. My passion is to put the tools that let you determine how you wish to live in the face of crisis into your own hands”. You can learn more about Debbie at http://www.beyondlimitshealing.com/.

Questions & Answers

How do I know that the practitioner I am working with is the right one?

You should be able to feel their genuine interest in you as a person, and to feel that there is the willingness to answer all your questions. You should feel comfortable when you ask yourself the question, “Does this doctor know what they are talking about?”

How do I deal with the anxiety and stress I’m feeling, during and after treatment?

There are simple tools that one can easily learn in the 2 day Avatar® ReSurfacing® course, that teach you how to use your will to move your attention to something else besides fear. The full 9 day Avatar® course offers an amazing experience of KNOWING that one is in control of their world, including their emotions.

How can I lose the fear of dealing with cancer?

First, find a doctor with whom you are comfortable. Then find a support team you can absolutely trust. Then trust them.

How can I cope better emotionally with my diagnosis and treatment?

There is and can be discovered by you a difference and separation between you (the mind, body and spirit) and the cancer. Check out the free mini-course at avatarepc.com called Creating Definition. When one is able to define oneself separate from the cancer, personal power returns. The full Avatar course is ideal for this, but even a few minutes spent on a mini-course will make a big difference.


HOME | HER STORY & MISSION | PROGRAMS | EVENTS | RESOURCES | TIGER BLOG | CONTACT US

Copyright 2006 TigerlilyFoundation.org | Web Design: TBM GRAPHIX